SQL Joins
Persistent touts itself as a database-agnostic interface. How, then, are you supposed to do things which are inherently backend-specific? This most often comes up in Yesod when you want to join two tables together. There are some pure-Haskell solutions that are completely backend-agonistic, but there are also more efficient methods at our disposal. In this chapter, we’ll introduce a common problem you might want to solve, and then build up more sophisticated solutions.
Database queries in Widgets
I’ll address this one right off the bat, since it catches many users by surprise. You might think that you can solve this problem in the Hamlet template itself, e.g.:
<ul>
$forall Entity blogid blog <- blogs
$with author <- runDB $ get404 $ blogAuthor
<li>
<a href=@{BlogR blogid}>
#{blogTitle blog} by #{authorName author}
However, this isn’t allowed, because Hamlet will not allow you to run database actions inside of it. One of the goals of Shakespearean templates is to help you keep your pure and impure code separated, with the idea being that all impure code needs to stay in Haskell.
But we can actually tweak the above code to work in Yesod. The idea is to
separate out the code for each blog entry into a Widget
function, and then
perform the database action in the Haskell portion of the function:
getHomeR :: Handler Html
getHomeR = do
blogs <- runDB $ selectList [] []
defaultLayout $ do
setTitle "Blog posts"
[whamlet|
<ul>
$forall blogEntity <- blogs
^{showBlogLink blogEntity}
|]
showBlogLink :: Entity Blog -> Widget
showBlogLink (Entity blogid blog) = do
author <- handlerToWidget $ runDB $ get404 $ blogAuthor blog
[whamlet|
<li>
<a href=@{BlogR blogid}>
#{blogTitle blog} by #{authorName author}
|]
We need to use handlerToWidget
to turn our Handler
action into a Widget
action, but otherwise the code is straightforward. And furthermore, we now get
exactly the output we wanted:
Joins
If we have the exact result we’re looking for, why isn’t this chapter over? The problem is that this technique is highly inefficient. We’re performing one database query to load up all of the blog posts, then a separate query for each blog post to get the author names. This is far less efficient than simply using a SQL join. The question is: how do we do a join in Persistent? We’ll start off by writing some raw SQL:
getHomeR :: Handler Html
getHomeR = do
blogs <- runDB $ rawSql
"SELECT ??, ?? \
\FROM blog INNER JOIN author \
\ON blog.author=author.id"
[]
defaultLayout $ do
setTitle "Blog posts"
[whamlet|
<ul>
$forall (Entity blogid blog, Entity _ author) <- blogs
<li>
<a href=@{BlogR blogid}>
#{blogTitle blog} by #{authorName author}
|]
We pass the rawSql
function two parameters: a SQL query, and a list of
additional parameters to replace placeholders in the query. That list is empty,
since we’re not using any placeholders. However, note that we’re using ??
in
our SELECT
statement. This is a form of type inspection: rawSql
will detect
the type of entities being demanded, and automatically fill in the fields that
are necessary to make the query.
rawSql
is certainly powerful, but it’s also unsafe. There’s no syntax
checking on your SQL query string, so you can get runtime errors. Also, it’s
easy to end up querying for the wrong type and end up with very confusing
runtime error messages.
Esqueleto
Persistent has a companion library- Esqueleto- which provides an expressive, type safe DSL for writing SQL queries. It takes advantage of the Persistent types to ensure it generates valid SQL queries and produces the results requested by the program. In order to use Esqueleto, we’re going to add some imports:
import qualified Database.Esqueleto as E
import Database.Esqueleto ((^.))
And then write our query using Esqueleto:
getHomeR :: Handler Html
getHomeR = do
blogs <- runDB
$ E.select
$ E.from $ \(blog `E.InnerJoin` author) -> do
E.on $ blog ^. BlogAuthor E.==. author ^. AuthorId
return
( blog ^. BlogId
, blog ^. BlogTitle
, author ^. AuthorName
)
defaultLayout $ do
setTitle "Blog posts"
[whamlet|
<ul>
$forall (E.Value blogid, E.Value title, E.Value name) <- blogs
<li>
<a href=@{BlogR blogid}>#{title} by #{name}
|]
Notice how similar the query looks to the SQL we wrote previously. One thing of
particular interest is the ^.
operator, which is a projection. blog ^.
BlogAuthor
, for example, means "take the author
column of the blog
table."
And thanks to the type safety of Esqueleto, you could never accidentally
project AuthorName
from blog
: the type system will stop you!
In addition to safety, there’s also a performance advantage to Esqueleto.
Notice the return
ed tuple; it explicitly lists the three columns that we
need to generate our listing. This can provide a huge performance boost: unlike
all other examples we’ve had, this one does not require transferring the
(potentially quite large) content
column of the blog post to generate the
listing.
Esqueleto is really the gold standard in writing SQL queries in Persistent. The rule of thumb should be: if you’re doing something that fits naturally into Persistent’s query syntax, use Persistent, as it’s database agnostic and a bit easier to use. But if you’re doing something that would be more efficient with a SQL-specific feature, you should strongly consider Esqueleto.
Streaming
There’s still a problem with our Esqueleto approach. If there are thousands of blog posts, then the workflow will be:
-
Read thousands of blog posts into memory on the server.
-
Render out the entire HTML page.
-
Send the HTML page to the client.
This has two downsides: it uses a lot of memory, and it gives high latency for the user. If this is a bad approach, why does Yesod gear you towards it out of the box, instead of tending towards a streaming approach? Two reasons:
-
Correctness: imagine if there was an error reading the 243rd record from the database. By doing a non-streaming response, Yesod can catch the exception and send a meaningful 500 error response. If we were already streaming, the streaming body would simply stop in the middle of a misleading 200 OK respond.
-
Ease of use: it’s usually easier to work with non-streaming bodies.
The standard recommendation I’d give someone who wants to generate listings that may be large is to use pagination. This allows you to do less work on the server, write simple code, get the correctness guarantees Yesod provides out of the box, and reduce user latency. However, there are times when you’ll really want to do a streaming response, so let’s cover that here.
Switching Esqueleto to a streaming response is easy: replace select
with
selectSource
. The Esqueleto query itself remains unchanged. Then we’ll use
the respondSourceDB
function to generate a streaming database response, and
manually construct our HTML to wrap up the listing.
getHomeR :: Handler TypedContent
getHomeR = do
let blogsSrc =
E.selectSource
$ E.from $ \(blog `E.InnerJoin` author) -> do
E.on $ blog ^. BlogAuthor E.==. author ^. AuthorId
return
( blog ^. BlogId
, blog ^. BlogTitle
, author ^. AuthorName
)
render <- getUrlRenderParams
respondSourceDB typeHtml $ do
sendChunkText "<html><head><title>Blog posts</title></head><body><ul>"
blogsSrc $= CL.map (\(E.Value blogid, E.Value title, E.Value name) ->
toFlushBuilder $
[hamlet|
<li>
<a href=@{BlogR blogid}>#{title} by #{name}
|] render
)
sendChunkText "</ul></body></html>"
Notice the usage of sendChunkText
, which sends some raw Text
values over
the network. We then take each of our blog tuples and use conduit’s map
function to create a streaming value. We use hamlet
to get templating, and
then pass in our render
function to convert the type-safe URLs into their
textual versions. Finally, toFlushBuilder
converts our Html
value into a
Flush Builder
value, as needed by Yesod’s streaming framework.
Unfortunately, we’re no longer able to take advantage of Hamlet to do our
overall page layout, since we need to explicit generate start and end tags
separately. This introduces another point for possible bugs, if we accidentally
create unbalanced tags. We also lose the ability to use defaultLayout
, for
exactly the same reason.
Streaming HTML responses are a powerful tool, and are sometimes necessary. But generally speaking, I’d recommend sticking to safer options.
Conclusion
This chapter covered a number of ways of doing a SQL join:
-
Avoid the join entirely, and manually grab the associated data in Haskell. This is also known as an application level join.
-
Write the SQL explicitly with
rawSql
. While somewhat convenient, this loses a lot of Persistent’s type safety. -
Use Esqueleto’s DSL functionality to create a type-safe SQL query.
-
And if you need it, you can even generate a streaming response from Esqueleto.
For completeness, here’s the entire body of the final, streaming example:
{-# LANGUAGE EmptyDataDecls #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
{-# LANGUAGE QuasiQuotes #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ViewPatterns #-}
import Control.Monad.Logger
import Data.Text (Text)
import qualified Database.Esqueleto as E
import Database.Esqueleto ((^.))
import Database.Persist.Sqlite
import Yesod
import qualified Data.Conduit.List as CL
import Data.Conduit (($=))
share [mkPersist sqlSettings, mkMigrate "migrateAll"] [persistLowerCase|
Author
name Text
Blog
author AuthorId
title Text
content Html
|]
data App = App
{ persistConfig :: SqliteConf
, connPool :: ConnectionPool
}
mkYesod "App" [parseRoutes|
/ HomeR GET
/blog/#BlogId BlogR GET
|]
instance Yesod App
instance YesodPersist App where
type YesodPersistBackend App = SqlBackend
runDB = defaultRunDB persistConfig connPool
instance YesodPersistRunner App where
getDBRunner = defaultGetDBRunner connPool
getHomeR :: Handler TypedContent
getHomeR = do
let blogsSrc =
E.selectSource
$ E.from $ \(blog `E.InnerJoin` author) -> do
E.on $ blog ^. BlogAuthor E.==. author ^. AuthorId
return
( blog ^. BlogId
, blog ^. BlogTitle
, author ^. AuthorName
)
render <- getUrlRenderParams
respondSourceDB typeHtml $ do
sendChunkText "<html><head><title>Blog posts</title></head><body><ul>"
blogsSrc $= CL.map (\(E.Value blogid, E.Value title, E.Value name) ->
toFlushBuilder $
[hamlet|
<li>
<a href=@{BlogR blogid}>#{title} by #{name}
|] render
)
sendChunkText "</ul></body></html>"
getBlogR :: BlogId -> Handler Html
getBlogR _ = error "Implementation left as exercise to reader"
main :: IO ()
main = do
-- Use an in-memory database with 1 connection. Terrible for production,
-- but useful for testing.
let conf = SqliteConf ":memory:" 1
pool <- createPoolConfig conf
flip runSqlPersistMPool pool $ do
runMigration migrateAll
-- Fill in some testing data
alice <- insert $ Author "Alice"
bob <- insert $ Author "Bob"
insert_ $ Blog alice "Alice's first post" "Hello World!"
insert_ $ Blog bob "Bob's first post" "Hello World!!!"
insert_ $ Blog alice "Alice's second post" "Goodbye World!"
warp 3000 App
{ persistConfig = conf
, connPool = pool
}