We are happy to announce the release of persistent 2.0
persistent 2.0 adds a flexible key type and makes some breaking changes. 2.0 is an unstable release that we want your feedback on for the soon to follow stable 2.1 release.
New Features
- type-safe composite primary and foreign keys
- added an upsert operation (update or insert)
- added an insertMany_ operation
Fixes
- An
Id
suffix is no longer automatically assumed to be a Persistent type - JSON serialization * MongoDB ids no longer have a prefix 'o' character.
Breaking changes
- Use a simple ReaderT for the underlying connection
- fix postgreSQL timezone storage
- remove the type parameter from EntityDef and FieldDef
In depth
Composite keys
The biggest limitation of data modeling with persistent is an assumption of a simple (for current SQL backends an auto-increment) primary key. We learned from Groundhog that a more flexible primary key type is possible. Persistent adds a similar flexible key type while maintaining its existing invariant that a Key is tied to a particular table.
To understand the changes to the Key
data type, lets look at a change in the test suite for persistent 2.
i <- liftIO $ randomRIO (0, 10000)
- let k = Key $ PersistInt64 $ abs i
+ let k = PersonKey $ SqlBackendKey $ abs i
Previously Key
contained a PersistValue
. This was not type safe. PersistValue
is meant to serialize any basic Haskell type to the database, but a given table only allows specific values as the key.
Now we generate the PersonKey
data constructor which specifies the Haskell key types.
SqlBackendKey
is the default key type for SQL backends.
Now lets look at code from CompositeTest.hs
mkPersist sqlSettings [persistLowerCase|
Parent
name String maxlen=20
name2 String maxlen=20
age Int
Primary name name2 age
deriving Show Eq
Child
name String maxlen=20
name2 String maxlen=20
age Int
Foreign Parent fkparent name name2 age
deriving Show Eq
|]
Here Parent has a composite primary key made up of 3 fields. Child uses that as a foreign key. The primary key of Child is the default key for the backend.
let parent = Parent "a1" "b1" 11
let child = Child "a1" "b1" 11
kp <- insert parent
_ <- insert child
testChildFkparent child @== parent
Future changes
Short-term improvements
Before the 2.1 release I would like to look at doing some simple things to speed up model compilation a little bit.
- Speed up some of the compile-time persistent code (there is a lot of obviously naive code).
- Reduce the size of Template Haskell generation (create a reference for each EntityDef and some other things rather than potentially repeatedly inlining it)
Medium-term improvement: better support for Haskell data types
We want to add better support for modeling ADTs, particularly for MongoDB where this is actually very easy to do in the database itself. Persistent already support a top-level entity Sum Type and a simple field ADT that is just an enumeration.
Another pain point is serializing types not declared in the schema. The declaration syntax in groundhog is very verbose but allows for this. So one possibility would be to allow the current DRY persistent declaration style and also a groundhog declaration style.
Long-term improvements: Projections
It would be possible to add projections now as groundhog or esqueleto have done. However, the result is not as end-user friendly as we would like. When the record namespace issue is dealt with in the GHC 7.10 release we plan on adding projections to persistent.
Ongoing: Database specific functionality
We always look forward to see more databases adapters for persistent. In the last year, a Redis and ODBC adapter were added.
Every database is different though, and you also want to take advantage of your database-specific features. esqueleto and persistent-mongoDB have shown how to build database specific features in a type-safe way on top of persistent.
Organization
Although the persistent code has no dependency on Yesod, I would like to make the infrastructure a little more independent of yesod. The first steps would be
- putting it under a different organization on github.
- having a separate mail list (should stackoverflow be prioritized over e-mail?)